Skip to content
← Instrument Rating

INSTRUMENT RATING 02 / LEARN · EXPLORE · CHECK

Instrument scan and cross-check

Build a purposeful cross-check, interpret changing indications, and catch fixation, omission, or an unreliable display before they degrade aircraft control.

Checking your account…

Your learning goals

  • Describe a scan that uses attitude and performance information together.
  • Recognize fixation, omission, and misplaced emphasis.
  • Adapt the cross-check to a changed maneuver or an unexpected indication.

Look, interpret, control, and look again

A cross-check is a continuous, logical comparison of instruments for attitude and performance information. Moving your eyes is only the first part. You must interpret the indications together, decide whether they match the intended flight condition, apply a suitable control input, and check its effect.

Ask three questions: What am I trying to maintain or change? What are the instruments actually showing? What small correction will close the difference? In level flight, a near-level attitude indication does not prove that altitude is constant. The altimeter and vertical-speed trend show whether that attitude is producing level flight at the current airspeed and power.

Cross-check includes a decision and a return to the instruments.Observe: Attitude, power, and performance. Interpret: Compare actual flight with the goal. Control and recheck: Correct the cause; verify the response.ObserveAttitude, power, and performanceInterpretCompare actual flight with the goalControl and recheckCorrect the cause; verify the response
Cross-check includes a decision and a return to the instruments.

For example, a slow altitude loss together with a nose-low indication suggests a pitch correction. An altitude loss with an unexpected bank also requires attention to bank. Reacting only to the altitude number can hide the reason for the loss. The same process applies to analog instruments and electronic displays.

IFH 6-10–6-13: fundamental skills, cross-check and interpretation · IFH 6-24–6-28: electronic-display cross-check

Let the maneuver determine your attention

The FAA describes several scan patterns. A selected radial scan repeatedly returns to a reliable attitude indicator between checks of other pertinent instruments. An inverted-V or rectangular pattern can help introduce instrument locations. These patterns are learning tools. The useful pattern is the one that repeatedly brings you the information needed for the maneuver.

During a transition, emphasize the attitude and power change while watching the developing performance. Once stabilized, emphasize the indications that verify the assigned altitude, heading, airspeed, or turn rate. Near a level-off or rollout, increase attention to the approaching target without dropping the rest of the cross-check.

Examples of changing scan emphasis
TaskInformation to revisit frequentlyInformation still needed
Straight-and-levelAltitude, heading, airspeedAttitude, power, vertical-speed trend, coordination
Constant-airspeed climbAirspeed and attitude; altitude toward level-offPower, heading, vertical speed, coordination
Turn to a headingBank or turn rate; heading toward rolloutAltitude, airspeed, power, coordination

A changing heading during a commanded turn is expected; an unplanned altitude loss is not. Studying each maneuver’s expected indications makes the scan selective without becoming narrow. Do not adopt a fixed number of seconds or a fixed percentage of attention as a guarantee of adequate coverage. Return often enough to detect and correct the actual trends.

IFH 6-10–6-13: scan patterns and errors · IFH 6-24–6-28: adapting the electronic-display scan · ACS IV.A, printed page 10

Recognize three different scan errors

Many control problems begin as information problems. Identify the scan error before simply trying to move your eyes faster.

Scan errors and a corrective habit
ErrorCockpit exampleCorrective habit
FixationYou stare at the heading indicator waiting for the rollout heading; altitude drifts unnoticed.Return to attitude, altitude, airspeed, and coordination while monitoring heading progress.
OmissionYou check attitude, heading, and altitude but repeatedly leave out the slip/skid indication.Bring the missing instrument back into the task-based scan and verify coordinated flight.
Misplaced emphasisYou use the attitude picture alone to judge level flight and give too little attention to the altimeter.Weight the information needed to verify the assigned flight condition, using several instruments together.

Fixation can come from uncertainty: you may be trying to decode a display or wondering why a number is wrong. Omission can follow an unanticipated transition, such as forgetting airspeed after changing power. Misplaced emphasis can grow from relying on the most familiar instrument even when it cannot answer the present question by itself.

When you catch one of these errors, restore aircraft control and the full cross-check, then simplify the competing task. Discuss recurring errors with your instructor. A smoother scan comes from knowing what each indication means and expecting the next change, not from a speed contest with your eyes.

IFH 6-11–6-13: fixation, omission and emphasis · IFH 6-27–6-28: electronic-display scan errors

When indications disagree, compare sources

A normal maneuver should produce a coherent group of indications. In a stabilized straight climb, altitude should increase, airspeed should settle near the selected climb speed, and heading should remain near the intended heading. A heading change or falling airspeed calls for interpretation and correction. A failure flag or an attitude display that disagrees with the other evidence also calls for a reliability check.

Maintain control using the reliable information while assessing the disagreement. Include standby instruments, system warnings, and power-source indications as appropriate to the aircraft. Two displays fed by the same attitude sensor are two presentations of one source. Airspeed, altimeter, and VSI may share a static source; their agreement does not rule out a common static-system problem.

Do not vote by screen count or assume that the familiar instrument is always right. Know the system’s dependencies before flight, and use the AFM/POH and installed-equipment procedures when a failure is suspected. Avoid making a large control input merely to satisfy one disputed indication. Detailed failure diagnosis and partial-panel control are developed later; this lesson establishes the habit of seeking corroborating evidence without abandoning control.

IFH 11-7–11-8: instrument and system failure recognition · IFH 6-24–6-28: standby information and cross-check

Protect the scan from sensations and distractions

Fatigue, illness, stress, hypoxia, and increasing workload can slow interpretation or narrow attention. Before flight, assess fitness and the demands of the planned trip. During flight, recognize when a radio call, chart search, or avionics entry is taking too much of the attention needed to control the airplane. Organize materials and make longer entries before a demanding transition when possible.

Use short task segments: check the airplane, make a manageable entry, and return to the cross-check. Defer a nonessential task, ask ATC for time or clarification, or use an appropriate trained resource when necessary. An unfamiliar display can add workload even though it presents more information. Before using it in IMC, locate attitude, airspeed, altitude, heading, power, coordination, failure flags, and standby references with your instructor.

Bodily sensations are not an independent instrument. A slow unnoticed bank followed by a correction can produce the leans. Abrupt head movement during a prolonged turn can create a Coriolis illusion. A sloping cloud edge or scattered lights may suggest a false horizon. Use reliable, corroborated instrument references when the visual horizon or sensations are misleading, and avoid sudden extreme head movements. Keep the aircraft control task ahead of the urge to make the sensation disappear.

AIM 8-1-1 through 8-1-3: fitness, hypoxia and stress-related impairment · IFH Chapter 3, 3-4–3-8: sensory systems and disorientation · AIM 8-1-5: illusions in flight · ACS IV.A, printed page 10

Work a drift before it becomes a larger deviation

Training example: the assigned targets are 4,000 feet, heading 090°, and 110 KIAS. These are invented study targets, not aircraft performance data. You briefly look down to change a frequency. On returning, the altimeter shows 3,960 feet and decreasing, heading is moving left through 087°, airspeed is slightly increasing, and the reliable attitude indicator shows a small left bank with a slightly lower pitch.

  1. Interpret the group: the airplane is drifting left and descending. The decreasing altitude is a trend, not just a 40-foot error. The attitude and performance indications agree.
  2. Restore control: use an appropriate small, coordinated bank correction to stop the unintended turn and a suitable pitch correction to arrest the descent. Verify power and airspeed rather than assuming they are unchanged.
  3. Recheck: confirm the heading trend has stopped, then make any small correction toward the assigned heading. Verify the descent arrests and return to altitude smoothly. Trim off sustained pressure after establishing the desired condition.
  4. Address the cause: divide future frequency or navigator work into shorter segments. If the task still exceeds your capacity, request time or assistance.

Your instructor will help choose the actual correction size and control sequence for the airplane. The ground exercise prepares interpretation and correction planning under ACS IV.A.S2; it cannot demonstrate the flying skill.

IFH 6-4–6-10: control, trim and cross-check · ACS IV.A, printed page 10

FLIGHT SCENARIO

What would change your plan?

In an instructor-led simulated-instrument flight, you begin a turn to an assigned heading. You stare at the heading display while entering a new radio frequency, then notice a descent and a rising airspeed. The attitude display and turn-rate indication corroborate an excessive bank. You feel as if the airplane is level. Identify the scan errors, decide which evidence supports the actual flight condition, and explain how you would restore the cross-check and manage the radio task.

  1. NoticeWhat does this situation require?
  2. VerifyWhat evidence is still missing?
  3. DecideWhat keeps an option open?
Compare your reasoning

Heading fixation and the competing radio task allowed attitude and performance information to be omitted. The corroborated bank, altitude, and airspeed trends support the instrument interpretation despite the level sensation. Use the aircraft-appropriate control corrections, recheck their effects, and trim after establishing the desired condition. Divide or defer the radio task and request assistance if needed. The scan’s emphasis must change through turn entry, the turn, and rollout; no single instrument or memorized eye pattern supplies the entire answer.

SUMMARY

A scan works when you interpret the relationship between indications.

Heading fixation and the competing radio task allowed attitude and performance information to be omitted. The corroborated bank, altitude, and airspeed trends support the instrument interpretation despite the level sensation. Use the aircraft-appropriate control corrections, recheck their effects, and trim after establishing the desired condition. Divide or defer the radio task and request assistance if needed. The scan’s emphasis must change through turn entry, the turn, and rollout; no single instrument or memorized eye pattern supplies the entire answer.

Before moving on, explain the decision in your own words: what would you verify, and what would make you change the plan?

PRACTICE

Flashcards and knowledge check

8 flashcards, then 8 questions with explanations.

Enable JavaScript for flashcards and the knowledge check. The lesson and scenario remain available without it.

Sources & lesson notes

Sources & lesson notes

  1. Instrument Flying Handbook, FAA-H-8083-15B, Chapter 6Sections I and II, printed 6-2–6-13 and 6-20–6-28: scan, interpretation, control, trim, trends and errors. Chapter 3 covers human factors; Chapter 11, 11-7–11-8 covers system failures.
  2. AIM 8-1-1 through 8-1-3 and 8-1-5Current online text checked October 8, 2026: fitness, hypoxia, physiological impairment and illusions including the leans, Coriolis illusion and false horizon.
  3. Instrument Rating – Airplane ACS, FAA-S-ACS-8C, IV.APrinted page 10 defines the knowledge, risk and skill elements. S2 is conceptual preparation here; aircraft performance must be demonstrated in instructor-led training.
  4. FAA handbook editions, errata and addendaFAA-listed IFH 15B and listed 2012 errata / 2015 and 2019 addenda checked October 8, 2026. Original diagrams illustrate relationships, not an aircraft panel or approved procedure.

For U.S. single-engine airplane instrument study. Official sources checked October 8, 2026; eCFR displayed Title 14 current through October 6, 2026. Use current publications and the applicable aircraft AFM/POH and avionics supplements. These lessons support ground study and do not replace required instruction, endorsements, experience, or tests.

ACS study associations

These associations identify the concepts taught here. Skill elements describe preparation for instructor-led flight training; reading or completing this lesson does not demonstrate flight proficiency.

  • IR.IV.A.K1 — Explains cross-check emphasis for level flight, turns, and climb transitions.
  • IR.IV.A.K2 — Interprets direct attitude, power and lagging performance information.
  • IR.IV.A.K3 — Distinguishes coherent maneuver indications from suspect or shared-source information.
  • IR.IV.A.R1 — Identifies fitness and workload factors that degrade the cross-check and mitigation choices.
  • IR.IV.A.R2 — Explains misleading sensations and visual horizons and use of reliable instruments.
  • IR.IV.A.R3 — Addresses display familiarization, standby information and system dependencies.
  • IR.IV.A.S2 — Conceptual preparation for instructor-led interpretation, correction and trim practice; no skill demonstration.